boxplot generated with Search Results


boxplot generated with  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc boxplot generated with
Boxplot Generated With, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pmc12048184-253-5-8?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplot generated with - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplots generated by the graphpad: prism 9 tool  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc boxplots generated by the graphpad: prism 9 tool
Boxplots Generated By The Graphpad: Prism 9 Tool, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pm37889853-81-4-9?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplots generated by the graphpad: prism 9 tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
r-generated boxplot  (RStudio)
90
RStudio r-generated boxplot
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
R Generated Boxplot, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pmc09836091-144-8-28?v=RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r-generated boxplot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplots generated using prism  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc boxplots generated using prism
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Boxplots Generated Using Prism, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/10__1002_slash_adfm__202314757-407-7-8?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplots generated using prism - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplot generation  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc boxplot generation
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Boxplot Generation, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pmc05768624-99-0-5?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplot generation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
spss-generated boxplots  (SPSS Inc)
90
SPSS Inc spss-generated boxplots
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Spss Generated Boxplots, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pm37592317-220-20-19?v=SPSS+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spss-generated boxplots - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
scatterplots and boxplots generated using  (RStudio)
90
RStudio scatterplots and boxplots generated using
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Scatterplots And Boxplots Generated Using, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pm39775384-257-6-9?v=RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scatterplots and boxplots generated using - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplots generated with  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp boxplots generated with
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Boxplots Generated With, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/pm40578474-120-5-8?v=OriginLab+corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplots generated with - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplots generated in  (RStudio)
90
RStudio boxplots generated in
<t>Boxplot</t> representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).
Boxplots Generated In, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/boxplot+generated+with/10__1080_slash_01441647__2020__1806941-124-15-18?v=RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplots generated in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Boxplot representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).

Journal: Microbial Genomics

Article Title: A step forward for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli identification and characterization in raw milk using long-read metagenomics

doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000911

Figure Lengend Snippet: Boxplot representing the minimal coverage required to assemble eae -positive STEC. The minimal coverage at which stx and eae were co-localized on the same contig is represented depending on the long-read assembler used on subsampled MinION data of 10 eae -positive STEC strains. The minimal coverage required for eae -positive STEC identification was confirmed when stx and eae genes were found on the same contig in all of the following assemblies with higher coverages (one exception was accepted). Flye was the most efficient to assemble eae -positive STEC with a genome coverage up to 35×, although the difference with Canu and Raven assemblers was not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P value >0.05).

Article Snippet: The resulting P values were represented on an R-generated boxplot using the ggpubr R package v0.4.0 ( https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/ ) and the -- stat_compare_means function on R v4.0.3 and R Studio v1.3.1093.

Techniques:

E. coli reads proportion and E. coli assembly metrics obtained from artificially contaminated raw milk. Raw milk samples were artificially contaminated with STEC at the concentrations of 0.5×10 3 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =3; 500), 0.5×10 2 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =4, 50) or 0.5×10 1 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =5, 5) of raw milk and enriched at 37 °C in the presence of acriflavine (37+A). (a) Boxplot representing the percentage of extracted E. coli reads. (b) Dotplot representing assembly metrics obtained from Flye assemblies on extracted E. coli reads. A triangle represents the identification of stx and eae genes on the same contig, whereas their identification on two different contigs is represented using a circle. Milk batches are represented using different colours.

Journal: Microbial Genomics

Article Title: A step forward for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli identification and characterization in raw milk using long-read metagenomics

doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000911

Figure Lengend Snippet: E. coli reads proportion and E. coli assembly metrics obtained from artificially contaminated raw milk. Raw milk samples were artificially contaminated with STEC at the concentrations of 0.5×10 3 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =3; 500), 0.5×10 2 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =4, 50) or 0.5×10 1 c.f.u. ml −1 ( n =5, 5) of raw milk and enriched at 37 °C in the presence of acriflavine (37+A). (a) Boxplot representing the percentage of extracted E. coli reads. (b) Dotplot representing assembly metrics obtained from Flye assemblies on extracted E. coli reads. A triangle represents the identification of stx and eae genes on the same contig, whereas their identification on two different contigs is represented using a circle. Milk batches are represented using different colours.

Article Snippet: The resulting P values were represented on an R-generated boxplot using the ggpubr R package v0.4.0 ( https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/ ) and the -- stat_compare_means function on R v4.0.3 and R Studio v1.3.1093.

Techniques: